🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document presents a flawed view of Europe. It claims that open-border policies and what it terms "progressive" agendas pose an existential threat to the continent's identity. Yet, this perspective is based on a serious misreading of the situation. The actual challenge confronting Europe is not societal but technological and economic lag.

The Stark Growth Gap Between Europe and the US

Statistics reveal a sobering picture. From 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by eighty-seven percent, while a mere 13.5% growth for the European Union. During this time, European income per person dropped from over three-quarters to just 50% of the American figure. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now has a higher per capita income than major European economies like Italy and France.

Today, about half of the world’s 50 largest technology firms are US-based, while a mere four are European.

The Technological Deficit: The Core Problem

This widening disparity stems from stronger productivity growth in the United States, fueled by breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of global tech dominance is overwhelmingly US-centric. Over the past five decades, 241 US firms have grown into enterprises valued at over ten billion dollars, versus just 14 in Europe.

This disparity raises a pressing issue: In the race for future industries like AI, semiconductors, and fusion energy, where does the EU positioned? Most analysts concede it is essentially a two-horse race between the United States and China, with Europe starting at a clear disadvantage.

Root Causes of the Continent's Innovation Gap

Several major factors explain this technological divide.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a much more robust and agile system for funding startups. Europe still lacks a genuine unified investment market, a factor that caps the growth potential of emerging companies.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided regulation hamper Europe. A US startup can introduce a service under a single regulatory framework to access a consumer base of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a larger population, is divided among twenty-seven separate systems, creating huge market obstacles.
• Mindset Differences: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure differ sharply. In parts of Europe, a startup's collapse was once viewed with penalties, whereas in the United States, it is often considered a badge of experience.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. The continent's chronic underinvestment in defense has weakened its capacity for breakthrough innovation.

A Path Forward: Reasons for Hopefulness

Despite these challenges, one can find causes for optimism. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the existential challenge and have started to advance serious reform. Key reports on European competitiveness and the internal market point to the need for major reforms.

Given appropriate incentives and regulatory reforms, these assets might enable much higher levels of business-led breakthroughs.

The continent retains considerable strengths: skilled human capital, excellent education systems, and premier research institutions. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and high savings rates, these foundations could unleash a new wave of venture creation.

Importantly, even if the EU does not take the lead in creating next-generation technologies, it can still significantly increase economic output by adopting and adapting innovations from other regions.

An Inflection Point

Europe now stands at a critical crossroads. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, the continent's technological decline has been steady. But, if it fails to take decisive action to address its structural weaknesses, today's slow erosion could turn into a rapid and permanent decline in world influence.